Controls designed for law-firm intake.
Review the privilege model, data controls, legal terms, DPA, privacy policy, and independent assurance materials in one place.
Privilege & confidentiality
How firm direction, attorney review, and the cited 2026 cases relate to privilege.
Read the privilege overview →Security & controls
No-training providers and short retention by default; isolation, redaction, and legal-hold controls are set up for each firm and tested before launch.
See the controls →Legal & DPA
Terms, privacy, the Data Processing Agreement with retention schedule and sub-processor terms, and AI-disclosure policy.
Open the legal pack →Questions counsel usually asks first.
It is structured as the firm’s confidential intake agent, with firm direction and human attorney review. That architecture is intended to support privilege, but no vendor can guarantee how a court will rule for a particular communication. Privilege overview →
Never. We use enterprise, no-training voice and language-model providers under contractual data-protection terms, including zero-data-retention API terms where available, so your callers' words never train a model and are purged on a short schedule. How data is handled →
A BAA can be arranged during implementation when required. The signed scope defines the applicable safeguards, including any redaction required before storage is enabled. Security details →
Documents for your counsel to review.
Read the approved legal documents here and verify Workforce AI’s independent assurance in the public Trust Center.